Petition seeking police protection from alleged threats by relatives. Counsel stated the father was no longer in contact and petitioners no longer resided at the disclosed address. Court disposed of the petition, permitting petitioners to approach the SHO if threatened; SHO to act per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State. Mr. Dinesh Kumar, SI, PS-Nand Nagri. Mr. Vikrant Bhardwaj and Mr. C S Chauhan, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 10.09.2025
“i. Pass a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent hereby directing the respondent to grant the protection to the precious life of the petitioners.
ii. Pass a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent thereby directing the respondent to make ensure that the parents and relatives of the petitioner No.2 should not assault upon the petitioners in any manner whatsoever.
iii. Pass a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent thereby directing the respondent to make ensure that the parents and relatives of the petitioner No.2 should not caused any kind of hindrance, obstruction, interference in the personal life, liberty and privacy of the petitioners.
iv. Pass a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent thereby directing the respondent to make ensure that the parents and relatives of the petitioner No.2 should
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2025 at 12:46:19
not visit at the property bearing No.248, Balmiki Mohalla, Sunder Nagari, Delhi.”
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 nk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2025 at 12:46:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether protection should be granted to a couple facing threats from relatives of Petitioner No. 2.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gaurav Kumar & Anr.
State NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
