Allowed¶20

Shubham Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Quashing of FIR – Settlement between parties

Delhi HC14 May 2025CRL.M.C./2181/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shubham Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi, CRL.M.C.2181/2025, High Court of Delhi, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, 14.05.2025 — quashing of FIR No. 011/2023 (Sections 354D/506/509 IPC, P.S. Dabri) qua petitioner on basis of Settlement Deed dated 22.03.2025; Section 528 BNSS; Section 482 Cr.PC; cross FIR No.0132/2022; complainant's no objection; charge sheet quashed.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No. 011/2023 registered at Police Station Dabri under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC, along with all subsequent proceedings and the charge sheet, qua the Petitioner; Petition disposed of. ¶20

Shubham Kumar Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~73

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C.2181/2025 & CRL.M.A.9825/2025

¶4

SHUBHAM KUMAR

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Rai Goel and Mr. Gagan Talwar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

¶8

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State SI Deepika P.S. Vikaspuri.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶11

% 14.05.2025

¶12

1 The Petition under Section 528 BNSS read with Section 482 Cr.PC, has been filed by the Petitioner Shubham Kumar, for quashing of the FIR bearing No. 011/2023 dated 04.01.2023 under Sections 354 D/506/509 IPC, registered at Police Station Dabri.

¶13

It is submitted that on 21.01.2022 there was some fight/attack which took place between the parties on account of some issues inter-se the two. A Complaint was filed by the Complainant on which the present FIR No.011/2023 dated 04.01.2023 was registered. Cross FIR No.0132/2022 P.S. Dabri was also registered against the Complainant under Section 354, 354D, 341, 323, 506, 509 and 34 IPC at Police Station Dabri.

¶14

It is submitted that the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 have already

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2025 at 13:15:15

¶17

sorted out their all differences with the intervention of their respective persons of the vicinity vide Settlement Deed dated 22.03.2025, and they have left no grudge or grievance against each other in any manner whatsoever. Therefore, the Petition be quashed.

¶18

The Complainant is present in the Court and submits that the matter stands settled with the accused vide Settlement Deed dated 22.03.2025, whereby both the parties have agreed for quashing of their respective FIRs. The Statement of the parties has already been recorded by the learned Joint Registrar. The Respondent No.2 has no objection if the FIR is quashed against the petitioner on account of the Settlement already arrived at between the parties.

¶19

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned.

¶20

In view of the submissions made, the Petition is allowed. Accordingly, the FIR bearing No. 011/2023 registered at Police Station Dabri, for offences punishable under Sections 354 D/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with all the subsequent proceedings and the charge sheet is hereby quashed qua the Petitioner.

¶21

The Petition stands disposed of.

¶22

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶23

MAY 14, 2025/va

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2025 at 13:15:15

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

Shubham Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shubham Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Xxx Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Victim Vs State and Anr.

Sunny Kant Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Ccl a Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Kanta Prasad Vs State(Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Aditya Singh and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.