Dismissed¶17

Tilak Raj Jain v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC3 Apr 2025CRL.M.C./2123/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.M.C. 2123/2025, Tilak Raj Jain v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr., Delhi High Court, Girish Kathpalia J., 03.04.2025; petition dismissed as withdrawn as infructuous; Additional Sessions Judge order dated 02.04.2025 vacated interim protection of respondent no.2; anticipatory bail applications in same FIR dismissed by two Delhi High Court orders and one Supreme Court order; PS Prashant Vihar; accompanying application CRL.M.A. 9539/2025 (stay); no merits adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the petition; the petition and the accompanying application CRL.M.A. 9539/2025 (stay) stand dismissed as withdrawn. ¶17

Tilak Raj Jain Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2123/2025 TILAK RAJ JAIN .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with SI Prashant Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate for R2

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R

¶8

% 03.04.2025

¶9

[ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

¶10

CRL.M.C. 2123/2025 & CRL.M.A. 9539/2025 (stay)

¶11

In furtherance of last order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 02.04.2025 vacated the interim protection granted to the present respondent no.2. That being so, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition as it has become infructuous.

¶12

On the other hand, learned senior counsel for respondent no.2 submits that order dated 02.04.2025 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge is contrary to record because the present respondent no.2 had duly disclosed the orders passed by this Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the anticipatory bail application itself.

¶13

The fact remains that the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition as interim protection granted by learned Additional Sessions Judge to the

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 13:55:34

¶16

present respondent no.2 stands withdrawn in view of two orders of this court and one order of Supreme Court, dismissing the anticipatory bail applications in same FIR.

¶17

Therefore as requested, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶19

APRIL 3, 2025/ rk

¶20

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 13:55:34

Tilak Raj Jain v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tilak Raj Jain v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Achinta Kumar Das Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Manjit Singh @ Manjeet Singh @Gulab Shera Vs State NCT of Delhi

Randeep Singh Vs the State NCT of Delhi through SHO & Anr.

M/S Goldy Company P. Ltd. Vs Nagendra Proprietor of Maa Shanti Papers

Smt. Rita Rani @Reena Kapoor Vs Smt Sangita Khaitan

Ashwani Kumar @ Ashu Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi