Petition to quash FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC was withdrawn by the petitioner after filing of the chargesheet, with liberty reserved to urge grounds before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
Through: Ms. Sakshi Kumar and Mr. Nitish Banka, Advocates.
versus
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State. SI Sumit Kumar and ASI Hakim Singh, P.S. Lajpat Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 3, 2025/ as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2025 at 11:58:52
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mayank Agarwal
State (GNCT of Delhi)
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
