Hari Kishan Garg & Anr. Vs Shikha Garg

$~71 & 72

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- CRL.M.C. 1799/2025 & CRL.M.A. 8103/2025 ( for stay)

HARI KISHAN GARG & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Sarin, Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms. Babita Rawat and Ms. Parul Dutta, Advocates versus SHIKHA GARG .....Respondent Through: None + CRL.M.C. 1802/2025 & CRL.M.A. 8108-8109/2025 NARESH KUMAR GARG & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Sarin, Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms. Babita Rawat and Ms. Parul Dutta, Advocates versus SHIKHA GARG .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 01.04.2025

¶5

Through the instant petitions, the Petitioners inter-alia seek quashing of summoning order dated 20^th February, 2023, passed by the M.M, Mahila Court, Shahdara, New Delhi, passed in Ct. No. 758/21, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.¹

¶6

After making some submissions, Mr. Varun Sarin, counsel for the

¶7

1 “DV Act”

¶8

This is a digitally signed order.

¶9

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2025 at 12:16:29

¶10

Petitioners, states that he would like to withdraw the present petitions. Before concluding, however, the Mr. Sarin requests that Mr. Naresh Kumar Garg (father-in-law of the complainant) and Mrs. Lalita Devi (mother-in-law of the complainant), who are the petitioners in Crl. MC 1802/2025, be exempted from personally appearing before the Trial Court. This request is made in consideration of Mr. Naresh Kumar Garg’s advanced age of 69, which requires him to use a walker for any movement, and Mrs. Lalita Devi, who is 66 years old and has been bedridden for the past 7-8 years, needing assistance with basic daily activities including eating and personal care. Mr. Sarin further submits that both the Petitioners are not very familiar with technology, but their counsel will provide the necessary assistance and facilitate their participation via video conferencing. He further assures the court that the Petitioners will be represented by their counsel, in person, before the trial court.

¶11

Considering the above, Mr. Naresh Kumar Garg and Mrs. Lalita Devi are exempted from personal appearance, and are permitted to join the proceedings before the Trial Court, through video conferencing mechanism, subject to just exceptions. They shall, however, be represented on each date of hearing through counsel.

¶12

On merits, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, stand infructuous.

¶13

The Court has not commented on the merits of the case. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

¶14

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶15

APRIL 1, 2025/ab

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2025 at 12:16:29

Hari Kishan Garg & Anr. v. Shikha Garg

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Kishan Garg & Anr. v. Shikha Garg

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Dhanpatrai Malhotra Vs Mahender Khari

Deepak Kumar and Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Md.Salaan Vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Opa Ram Vs State(Nct of Delhi)

Priyank Gupta Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Neeti Sharma Vs Saranjit Singh