Writ petition under Article 226 seeking directions from the respondents for providing protection to petitioners from respondent no. 4; disposed after SHOs head contact details were shared.
The petition is disposed of after the provision of mobile numbers for the SHO concerned and the Beat Constable to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
SMT.FARHIN SABA & ANR.
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Adhan Ahmed and Mohd. Mobeen, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 26.05.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:02:05
SHALINDER KAUR, J
MAY 26, 2025/SU/KP Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:02:05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State is directed to provide protection to the petitioners from respondent no. 4 via the SHOs head and beat constable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Farhin Saba
State (NCT of Delhi)
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
