Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition and raise the same contentions before the Trial Court; leave was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Leave to withdraw granted; liberty to pursue contentions before Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
DOORASTH SHIKSHA PVT LTD & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Mr. Anshul Wadhwa and Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Advocates
versus
Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocate for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 19.02.2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners prayed for leave to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to raise all the contents made herein before the learned Trial Court.
Leave is granted.
The petition along with pending application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2025 Rk/mk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:45:29
Doorasth Shiksha Pvt Ltd & Ors.
State NCT of Delhi
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
