Dismissed¶10
Saroj Kumar v. Seema
Delhi HCCRL.A./172/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Non-prosecution dismissal; continuous non-appearance of appellants; court notice returned unserved ('no such person is available at the given address'); notice served through son; CRL.A. 172/2017 Saroj Kumar v. Seema; CRL.A. 173/2017 Satish Kumar v. Seema; Delhi High Court; Sanjeev Narula, J.; order dated 16.01.2025; no counsel on record.
What did the court decide?
In view of the continuous non-appearance of the Appellants despite service of court notices, it is evident that the Appellants have lost interest in the present appeals. ¶9