Appeal against conviction under Sections 325/34 IPC. Counsel did not challenge conviction; sought sentence modification citing custody already undergone and his role as an accomplice. Sentence modified to period already undergone, fine enhanced to Rs.25,000/-, Rs.15,000/- payable to complainant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~72
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 11.12.2025
CRL.M.A. 37014/2025
CRL.A. 1683/2025 and CRL.M.(BAIL) 2454/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 11:28:06
years 01 month and 10 days. It is further submitted that he is in judicial custody since 05.12.2025, i.e. the date of passing of Order on Sentence.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
DECEMBER 11, 2025/ R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 11:28:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Order on Sentence of RI 3 years 6 months under Sections 325/34 IPC should be modified to the period already undergone, with enhanced fine.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Neeraj Kumar @ Gangster
State NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
