Raju v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition seeking premature release via writ mandamus directed to Sentence Review Board was treated as a representation and forwarded to competent authority for decision per applicable procedure.
What the court decided
$~84
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1594/2025
RAJU .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.) for State with Mr. Arijit Sharma, Mr. Nikunj Bindal & Ms. Nishtha Bindal, Advs. Insp. Manish Bhatti, P.S. B.H. Dairy.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
- O R D E R
- % 15.05.2025
- This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
- The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted premature release from custody following his sentence, as considered by the Sentence Review Board?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raju
- respondent
State (NCT of Delhi)
Coram
Amit Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court