Devi Vs Kiran Devi

¶1

$~50

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.L.P. 158/2025

¶4

DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus

¶5

KIRAN DEVI .....Respondent Through:

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 15.07.2025 1. The present leave to appeal is filed under Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘ BNSS ’) against the judgement dated 18.12.2024, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (‘ JMFC ’), South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, whereby the respondent was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘ NI Act ’) in Complaint Case No. 15327/2018.

¶7

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320, the petitioner being a victim is entitled to file an appeal against the judgment of acquittal and is not required to seek leave to appeal. He submits that the present petition be transferred to the learned Court of Sessions to be treated as an appeal.

¶8

The Hon’ble Apex Court in the recent decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran ( supra ) has opined that a complainant who prefers a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act is an aggrieved party who suffers economic loss due

¶9

This is a digitally signed order.

¶10

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2025 at 13:00:43

¶11

to dishonour of cheque, and such a complainant qualifies as a victim within the meaning of Section 2(wa) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘ CrPC’ ). Consequently, it was held that such a complainant is entitled to the benefit of the proviso of Section 372 of CrPC, enabling them to maintain an appeal against an order of acquittal without seeking leave to appeal under Section 378(4) of the CrPC.

¶12

The petitioner was the complainant in the complaint preferred under Section 138 of the NI Act, thus is entitled to maintain an appeal under Section 413 of the BNSS [ erstwhile Section 372 of the CrPC] against the judgment of acquittal. 5. In terms of proviso to Section 413 of the BNSS, an appeal by a victim against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned magistrate will have to be heard by the learned Court of Sessions. If the petition is allowed to continue before this Court, the parties will stand to lose a forum of challenge. 6. In view of the above, the present matter is disposed of with direction that the present petition be treated as an appeal under proviso to Section 413 of the BNSS and numbered accordingly. 7. The Registry is directed to transfer entire record of the case to the concerned Appellate Court of Sessions. 8. The order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge for compliance and listing before the concerned Appellate Court on 27.08.2025. 9. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Appellate Court on 27.08.2025.

¶13

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶14

JULY 15, 2025

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2025 at 13:00:43

Devi v. Kiran Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devi v. Kiran Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Vs Vikas @ Billa

Narender Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Prem Chand Vs State and Others

M/S Rashtriya Mahila Kosh Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ikramuddin Vs M/S Classic Construction Co.

M/S Mahindra Building Material Supplier Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.