The Directorate of Enforcement sought permission to withdraw its petition, and the Delhi High Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn. The order records no substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel, Mr. Kartik Sabharwal and Mr. Chinmay Panigrahi, Advocates for ED.
versus
MRIDULA KAPUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Dewan, Ms. Nikita Dewan, Mr. Ayush Kumar and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 01.04.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 1, 2025 rk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/04/2025 at 12:27:08
Directorate of Enforcement
Mridula Kapur
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
