Allowed¶20

Dinesh Tokas & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC10 Mar 2025CRL.M.C./1391/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; CRL.M.C. 1391/2025; CRL.M.A. 6199/2025-Exp; quashing of FIR on compromise/settlement; FIR No.71/2019; Sections 448, 506, 34 IPC; P.S. Kishan Garh/Kishangarh; Section 482 CrPC; Section 528 BNSS 2023; Compromise Deed 21.01.2025; affidavits and ID proofs; parties verified in court; APP no objection; Gian Singh (2012) 10 SCC 303; Narinder Singh (2014) 6 SCC 466; Justice Saurabh Banerjee; order dated 10.03.2025; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No.71/2019 registered under Sections 448/506/34 IPC at P.S. Kishan Garh, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom; the petition and pending application disposed of. ¶20

Dinesh Tokas & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~51

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1391/2025, CRL.M.A. 6199/2025-Exp

¶4

DINESH TOKAS & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Deepak Singh, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with SI Kuldeep Singh and SI Deepak Tanwar, PS: Kishangarh

¶8

Mr. A.P. Sidharth, Mr. Rajiv Singh Pilania and Mr. Girdhari Singh, Advocates with respondent no.2 in person.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R

¶11

% 10.03.2025

¶12

The petitioners vide the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seek quashing of FIR No.71/2019 registered under Sections 448/ 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S. Kishan Garh, Delhi and all proceeding emanating therefrom in view of the Compromise Deed dated 21.01.2025 entered between the petitioners and the respondent no.2.

¶13

The petition is supported by affidavits of all the petitioners and of respondent no.2 alongwith proofs of their respective I.Ds.

¶14

The present petition is accompanied by the said Compromise Deed dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure-C) and is also supported by the identity cards

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:47:04

¶16

of the parties.

¶17

The petitioner nos.1 to 3 and respondent no.2 are present in Court and have been identified by the Investigation Officer.

¶18

The credentials of the petitioner nos.1 to 3 as also the respondent no.2 have been verified by this Court. 6. Respondent no.2 affirms the Compromise Deed dated 21.01.2025 and affirms that he has settled all his disputes with the petitioners. He, thus confirms that all disputes inter se the parties stands amicably settled in view of Compromise Deed dated 21.01.2025.

¶19

Mr. Raghuinder Verma, learned APP for the State submits that he has no objections to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 8. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and following the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466 , this Court is of the opinion that continuation of the aforesaid FIR will be an exercise in futility.

¶20

Accordingly, the present application is allowed and FIR No.71/2019 registered under Sections 448/ 506/ 34 IPC at P.S. Kishan Garh, Delhi, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶21

The present petition alongwith the pending application stands disposed of.

¶22

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶23

MARCH 10, 2025/So

¶24

Dinesh Tokas & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Tokas & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Kumar Ray Vs Amitabh Talwar

Roshil & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sunil Mittal & Anr. Vs Mohammad Hanif Khan

Vijay Kumar & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited Vs Central Bureau of Investigation Eo I New Delhi

Vipin & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.