Petition dismissed in default as neither petitioner nor respondent no.2 appeared on the date of hearing, and the petitioner had also been absent on the previous date.
None; petition dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
NASEEMA SHEIKH .....Petitioner Through: None.
Versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for RespondentState
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 17.03.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 17, 2025
r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:33:03
Naseema Sheikh
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
