Criminal writ seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 69 BNS following settlement between petitioner and complainant, who consented before the court. The FIR and charge sheet were quashed qua the petitioner.
FIR No.0149/2025 under Section 69 BNS with all subsequent proceedings and charge sheet quashed qua the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Faiz Imam, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANOTHER
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Ld. Standing Counsel for State with SI Ranjana P.S. Subji Mandi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
% 04.08.2025 CRL.M.A. 12496/2025 ( Seeking Exemption )
W.P.(CRL) 1330/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2025 at 12:14:33
got registered against the Petitioner.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 4, 2025/va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2025 at 12:14:33
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No.0149/2025 under Section 69 BNS be quashed in terms of the settlement/MOU dated 16.04.2025 between the parties?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
HARSH
STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
Complainant/Respondent No.2
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
