Allowed
Satish Bhati v. State
Delhi HCCRL.A./1211/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court allowed the appeal to abate because the appellant had died. The surety was discharged following the submission of verified death documents.
What did the court decide?
The appeal stands disposed of as abated. The surety stands discharged.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~7
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 1211/2011 SATISH BHATI .....Appellant Through: None. versus
¶4
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for State with W/SI Priyanka, PSKeshavpuram.
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 21.08.2025
¶6
- This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.
¶7
- Learned APP for the State, on instruction from SI Priyaka, Investigating Officer, submits that the Appellant has expired on 21st November, 2023. The death certificate has been filed and duly verified by the concerned SHO. A status report in this regard has also been filed on record. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of as abated. The Surety stands discharged.
¶8
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
¶9
AUGUST 21, 2025 v/abk
¶10
This is a digitally signed order.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Satish Bhati
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court