Nargis v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant in a criminal appeal against acquittal of the respondent stated she did not wish to pursue the appeal being well-settled. The court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn and cancelled the bail bond of the respondent no. 2.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn. Bail bond of Respondent No. 2 cancelled and surety discharged.
What the court decided
$~13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1147/2011 NARGIS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Gautam, Ms. Mansi, Ms. Vandana Sharma and Mr. Ms. Munazza, Advocates along with Appellant in person. versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP with Mr. Naveen, Mr. Arsalan Naik, Mr. Suil Singh Rawat, Mr. Vishal Jha, Mr. Siddharth Goyal and Mr. Vineet A., Advocates for State. SI Rajnandini, P.S. Hauz Qazi. Mr. Sushil Kumar Chauhan and Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocates for R-2 along with R-2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R
% 10.12.2025
- This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
- The present criminal appeal has been filed by the Appellant under Section 372 of Criminal Code of Procedure against the impugned judgment dated 11th July, 2011 passed by the trial court, whereby the Respondent No. 2 – Harun Rashid had been acquitted from the charges framed against him for the offences punishable under Sections 376/420 of Indian Penal Code.
- Ld. Counsel for the Appellant, on instructions from the Appellant,
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 12:30:44
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nargis
- respondent
State & Anr
Coram
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court