Rajeev v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal against conviction under Sections 363/366/376 IPC; the appellant had already served his entire sentence and did not press the appeal. The High Court disposed of the appeal as not pressed along with pending applications.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 1032/2008 RAJEEV .....Appellant
Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate. versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State along with Mr. Sunil Singh Rawat, Mr.Naveen, Mr. Arsalan Naik, Mr.Siddhartha Goyal and Ms. Swati Pandit, Advocates with SI Ramniwas, PS Uttam Nagar. Mr. Raghav Luthra, Mr. Vinod Kumar and Ms. Shashank Sharma, Advocates for Prosecutrix/Complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R % 19.11.2025
- This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.
- The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant –Rajeev under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 08th July, 2008 and 11th July, 2008 respectively, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, Rohini, Delhi, in Session Case bearing No. 236/2006 arising out of FIR No. 739/2006 registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC at PS-Uttam Nagar. 3. The Appellant was convicted under Sections 363/366/376 IPC.
CRL.A. 1032/2008
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajeev
- respondent
The State
Coram
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court