Disposed¶22

Court on Its Own Motion v. Prashant Jain

Delhi HC22 Jan 2025CONT.CAS.(CRL)/17/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court Division Bench (Prathiba M. Singh and Dharmesh Sharma, JJ.) in CONT.CAS.(CRL) 17/2024, decided 22.01.2025, disposed of a criminal contempt reference arising from alleged misbehaviour by advocate Prashant Jain before the Family Court, Patiala House Courts, Delhi; unconditional apology accepted on compassionate grounds owing to medical condition, contempt notice discharged, advocate cautioned against future aggressive conduct.

What did the court decide?

Unconditional apology accepted; contempt notice discharged; proceedings closed; Respondent cautioned against aggressive behaviour in Court in future. ¶22

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Prashant Jain — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CONT.CAS.(CRL) 17/2024

¶4

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner Through:

¶5

versus

¶6

PRASHANT JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 22.01.2025

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present contempt proceeding has been referred to this Division Bench pursuant to the order dated 9th October, 2024 passed by Ms. Sukhvinder Kaur, learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Patiala House Courts, Delhi and contempt reference dated 24th October, 2024 addressed from the said Court to the learned Registrar General of this Court.

¶13

The principal allegation against the Contemnor is that he had misbehaved with the Court during proceedings in the case, HMA 108/22 and M. No. 39/2023 titled, ‘ Brig. Vijendra Singh Joon v. Neelam Joon Nee Neelam Dhanker ’.

¶14

Vide order dated 9^th December, 2024, the Respondent/Contemnor-Mr. Prashant Jain was called to show cause as to why contempt action ought not to be initiated against him. He is present in the Court today.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:40:27

¶16

He firstly tenders an unconditional apology and submits that his only concern is that the application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ought to be decided by the Court.

¶17

The Respondent-Contemnor is a lawyer and is also suffering from a serious medical condition for which he is undergoing treatment. He submits that he usually has never faced any such allegations of contempt and he has always behaved well before the Courts.

¶18

He further submits that he may have to undergo some major procedure next month for treatment of his condition.

¶19

After having perused the order by which the contempt reference has been made and after considering the unconditional apology, which has been tendered today and the medical condition of the Respondent, the Court takes a compassionate view of the matter and accepts the apology of the Respondent.

¶20

The Respondent, who is a lawyer shall ensure in future not to indulge in any such aggressive behaviour in the Court.

¶21

The proceedings are closed and the contempt notice is discharged.

¶22

In view of above, matter is disposed of accordingly.

¶23

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶24

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶25

JANUARY 22, 2025/ gunn/Am

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:40:27

Court on Its Own Motion v. Prashant Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Court on Its Own Motion v. Prashant Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Om Gems and Jewellery Vs Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Import) Air Cargo Complex Nscbi Airport & Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Ray Vs the State through SHO Ohkla Industrial Area

Pramod Vijay Khullar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Commissioner of Customs(Airport and General), New Delhi Vs Global Links

Nivin Verma Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr. & Ors. & Ors.

Anjali Pandey Vs Union of India and Ors.