Disposed¶43

Kinri Dhir v. Veer Singh

Delhi HC15 May 2025CONT.CAS(C)/833/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kinri Dhir v. Veer Singh; Delhi High Court; contempt; CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023; CONT.CAS(C) 833/2023; CONT.CAS(C) 1060/2023; MAT.APP.(F.C.) 2/2022; Civil Appeal No. 4711/2023; Supreme Court order dated 22.01.2024; look out circular; disposal of contempt proceedings; withdrawal of criminal proceedings; maintenance Rs. 3,00,000/- per month; rent Rs. 1,50,000/- per month; security deposit Rs. 5,00,000/-; execution proceedings preserved; Justice Prathiba M. Singh; Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta; order dated 15.05.2025.

What did the court decide?

All three contempt petitions and pending applications disposed of in view of the Supreme Court's order in Civil Appeal No. 4711/2023; the Petitioner remains free to pursue her other remedies, including execution proceedings. ¶43

Kinri Dhir Vs Veer Singh — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶43

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the Supreme Court's order dated 22.01.2024 in Civil Appeal No. 4711/2023 setting aside the impugned orders and disposing of the contempt proceedings, the three contempt petitions remain to be pursued or stand disposed of. +1 more

¶36

Court's answer

CONT. CAS (C) No. 603/2023 (Item No. 59), wherein the contempt alleged relates to payments of arrears, is covered by the order of the Supreme Court.

¶37

Ratio / Principle

The same coverage extends to Item Nos. 60 and 61, i.e., CONT. CAS (C) Nos. 833/2023 and 1060/2023.

¶37

Key takeaways

On a perusal of the Supreme Court's order, the contempt petitions are no longer to be pursued and stand disposed of; in respect of any other grievance the Petitioner is pursuing her remedies in accordance with law.ratio¶7
The disposal of the contempt petitions does not affect any execution proceedings or any other proceedings which the Petitioner may be pursuing against the Respondent.ratio¶42

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Prathiba M. Singh and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, JJ.; order dated 15.05.2025) disposed of three contempt petitions - CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023, 833/2023 and 1060/2023 - filed by Kinri Dhir against Veer Singh alleging violation of orders passed in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 2/2022 and in the contempt proceedings. The Court held that, by order dated 22.01.2024 in Civil Appeal No. 4711/2023, the Supreme Court - recording the parties' agreement to withdraw all criminal proceedings against each other and directing continued monthly payments of Rs. 1,50,000/- towards rent and Rs. 3,00,000/- towards maintenance, besides Rs. 5,00,000/- towards security deposit - had set aside the impugned orders of the High Court and the Trial Court and disposed of the contempt proceedings. All three contempt petitions and pending applications were accordingly disposed of, with a clarification that the disposal would not affect the Petitioner's other remedies, including execution proceedings.

¶1

$~59, 60 & 61

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023, CM APPLs. 23610/2023 & 26166/2023

¶3

KINRI DHIR			.....	Petitioner
	Through:	Ms.Shivangi Advocates	Luthra	Lohiya,
	versus
VEER SINGH			.....R	espondent
	Through:	Mr.Nikhil Ko Ganpath, Advo	hli and cates	Ms.Akshaya
+ CONT.CA	S(C) 833/20	23 & CM APPL	. 38253/2	023
KINRI DHIR			.....P	etitioner
	Through: versus	Ms.Shivangi Advocates	Luthra	Lohiya,
VEER SINGH			.....Re	spondent
	Through:	Mr.Nikhil Ko Ganpath, Advo	hli and cates	Ms.Akshaya
+ CONT.CAS(C) KINRI DHIR	1060/2023, C	M APPLs. 3922	5/2023 & .....Pe	39226/2023 titioner
	Through: versus	Ms.Shivangi Advocates	Luthra	Lohiya,
VEER SINGH			.....Re	spondent
	Through:	Mr.Nikhil Ko Ganpath, Advo	hli and cates	Ms.Akshaya

¶4

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

¶5

O R D E R

¶6

% 15.05.2025

¶7

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶8

These are three contempt cases arising out of a MAT. APP (F.C.) 2/2022 between the parties. There were allegations made by the Petitioner

¶9

CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023 & connected matters

¶10

Page 1 of 5

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:39:56

¶12

against the Respondent of violation of various orders. The details are set out in the chart below:

¶13

*CONT.* *CAS* _(C) _ *603/2023*	*No.*	●Orders dated 26th July, 2022 and 23rd January, 2023 in**MAT.APP.(F.C.) 2/2022**,
*CONT.* *CAS* _(C) _ *833/2023*	*No.*	●Orders dated 01st June 2023, 23rd May 2023, 19th May 2023 and 09th May 2023 in**Cont. Cas. (C) No. 603/2023 ●Order dated 09th May 2023 inMat. Appeal (FC) No. 2/2022**
*CONT.* *CAS* *No.1060/2023*	*(C)*	●Order dated 19th July, 2023 in**Cont. Cas.(C) No. 833/2023 ●Order dated 09th May 2023 inMat. App. (F.C.) No. 2/2022**

¶14

It is submitted that a Look Out Circular was issued in view of the order dated 6^th July, 2023 in Contempt Case 833/2023 . The said order was challenged by the Respondent before the Supreme Court which was disposed of in Civil Appeal No. 4711/2023 vide order dated 22^nd January, 2024. The order of the Supreme Court reads as under:

¶15

“ 1. The appeal is taken up for hearing.

¶16

2. The appeal challenges the order dated 06th July, 2023, by which the learned Division Bench of the High Court has sentenced the appellant for Simple Imprisonment of three months with a fine of Rs. 2,000/-.

¶17

3. There is series of litigation pending between the appellant and the respondent . On one hand, it is the submission of the appellant that though he was in relationship with the respondent, they are not married. However, he admits that the child born out of the said relationship is his child.

¶18

CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023 & connected matters

¶19

Page 2 of 5

¶20

¶21

4. Per contra, it is the case of the respondent that the respondent was induced by the appellant into having a relationship with him on the pretext that they are already married.

¶22

5. There are also various proceedings pending between the parties with regard to the award of maintenance and the payment of rent towards the accommodation, where the respondent and her child would reside.

¶23

6. There are also various criminal proceedings filed by both the parties against each other.

¶24

7. Both the appellant and the respondent agree that they will withdraw all the criminal proceedings filed by them against each other . However, it is further agreed that till the appropriate orders with regard to the enhancement/reduction of the maintenance are passed by the competent Court, the appellant shall continue to pay an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- per month towards rent of the accommodation to be occupied by the respondent and her child. This would be in addition to the maintenance, which is at the rate of Rs. 3,00,000/- per month.

¶25

8. We further find that insofar as the rental accommodation is concerned, the respondent would be required to pay certain security amount as deposit. In the interest of justice, the appellant shall pay an additional amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the respondent towards security deposit and security charge.

¶26

9. In that view of the matter, the impugned orders passed by the High Court as well as by the Trial Court are hereby set aside. The contempt proceeding(s) shall stand disposed of.

¶27

10. The appellant shall continue to pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/towards the rent and the maintenance @ Rs. 3,00,000/- for the respondent and her child on or prior to 5th of every month. Preferably, the said amount would be paid on the 1st of every month.

¶28

11. In addition to the aforesaid amount, the appellant shall also pay an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- so as to meet the expenses towards the security deposit and shifting etc. within a period of three days from today.

¶29

12. It is needless to state that disposal of the present proceedings would not influence the Court before whom the maintenance proceedings are pending.

¶30

CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023 & connected matters

¶31

Page 3 of 5

¶32

¶33

13. It is also needless to add that all the interim orders passed by the various Courts shall stand modified with the aforesaid terms and nothing observed herein shall be construed as having effect on the proceedings for enhancement/reduction of maintenance pending between the parties.

¶34

14. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

¶35

15. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.”

¶36

We find that in respect of all the disputes which have arisen qua maintenance, payment of rent accommodation etc., and the criminal proceedings, the Supreme Court had finally given directions which are extracted above. The Supreme Court had also observed that all the impugned orders passed by the High Court as well as the Trial Court are set aside and the contempt proceedings shall stand disposed of

¶37

In item No. 59, i.e., CONT. CAS (C) No. 603/2023 the order of which contempt is alleged in respect of payments of arrears would clearly be covered by the order of the Supreme Court. The same would be the position for Item No. 60 and 61, i.e, CONT. CAS (C) No. 833/2023 and 1060/2023 . 6. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is permitted to pursue her remedies in respect of any other arrears. Whereas, ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that the Petitioner has already availed of her remedies in respect of any other directions that she seeks. However, contempt proceedings are not to be pressed.

¶38

A perusal of the above order passed by the Supreme Court leaves no manner of doubt that contempt petitions are no longer to be pursued and that they have all been disposed of. In respect of any other grievance the Petitioner may have, the Petitioner is stated to be pursuing her remedies in accordance with law.

¶39

CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023 & connected matters

¶40

Page 4 of 5

¶41

¶42

It is clarified that this order shall also not affect any execution proceedings or any other proceedings which the Petitioner may be pursuing against the Respondent.

¶43

All the three petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

¶44

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶45

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

¶46

MAY 15, 2025 /SV/Ar.

¶47

CONT.CAS(C) 603/2023 & connected matters

¶48

Page 5 of 5

¶49

Kinri Dhir v. Veer Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kinri Dhir v. Veer Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pallavi Sharma Vs Shri Katikithal Srinivas and Ors.

Mohammad Zahid Vs Municipal Coropration of Delhi through Its Commisioner & Ors.

Aashish Sethi Vs Amol Srivastava & Ors.

Smt. Preeti Gupta Vs Sh. Surender Gupta @Sumit

Mukesh Rajora Vs Sh. K.K.Verma and Anr.

Shabnam Rashid Vs Rashid Malik

Manoj Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Amit Bansal Vs Amit Garg

Verto Bizserv Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Surender Kumar Gupta Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Rus Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Principal Additional Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence and Ors.

Sunny Jagga Vs Union of India & Anr.

Krishna Traders Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary & Ors.

Kinri Dhir Vs Veer Singh