Mr. Ravikash Patel v. Mr. Shankar Pandit & Anr.

Delhi HC23 Apr 2025CONT.CAS(C)/613/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court contempt case (Justice Anish Dayal, order dated 23.04.2025): alleged wilful disobedience of WP(C) No. 3634/2025 order dated 24.03.2025; delayed MCD decision on representation dated 21.04.2025; no fresh tender issued for contracted sites; contempt petition disposed of with liberty to seek remedies; pending applications infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to seek remedies in accordance with law; pending applications (if any) rendered infructuous. ¶¶20

Mr. Ravikash Patel Vs Mr. Shankar Pandit & Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~86

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 613/2025 CM APPL. 23744/2025

¶4

MR. RAVIKASH PATEL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Ahmad Mishra, Ms. Vandita Jain, Ms. Ayushi Rajput, Mr. Devansh Pundir, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

MR. SHANKAR PANDIT & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Sourav Verma Mr. Shivam Singh and Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Chawdhari, ASO and Mr. Bir Singh, ASO.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 23.04.2025

¶10

This petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of order dated 24^th March 2025, passed by the Court in WP(C) NO. 3634/2025.

¶11

The relevant directions passed by the Court are as under:

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:54:58

¶14

Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel for MCD/respondent, has presented a decision dated 21^st April 2025, on a representation of the petitioner; copy of which has been given to counsel for petitioner. The response may be filed on record of this Court by MCD.

¶15

Counsel for petitioner raises a vehement objection to the delay in deciding the representation considering that three weeks had been given by order dated 24^th March 2025, and they had to approach this Court ultimately in the contempt petition in order to secure the response, which has now been issued, just a couple of days prior to this matter being listed today.

¶16

It is stated that counsel for MCD has not proceeded ahead with the issuance of fresh tender in respect of the same sites to which contract had been entered into with petitioner.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶19

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:54:58

¶20

Contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to seek remedies in accordance with law. Pending applications (if any) are rendered infructuous.

¶21

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶22

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶23

APRIL 23, 2025/RK/ bp

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶26

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:54:58

Mr. Ravikash Patel v. Mr. Shankar Pandit & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Ravikash Patel v. Mr. Shankar Pandit & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Gupta Proprietor Mahan Polymers Vs Ms Chanchal Yadav Commissioner Delhi Goods and Sevice Tax & Anr.

Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. Vs Reliance Infrastructure Limited & Ors.

Pallavi Trivedi Vs Maneesh Trivedi

Punj Lloyd Limited Vs Anu Kukreja & Ors.

Smt. Sandhya Singh & Ors. Vs Shri Amar Pal Singh

Ashish Dhir Vs Nishi Dhir & Anr.

Rohit Bohra Vs Divyangi Singh

Dharam Veer Singh Vs National Research Development Corporation

Santosh Kumar Gupta Proprietor Mahan Polymers Vs Ms Chanchal Yadav Commissioner Delhi Goods and Sevice Tax & Anr.

Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. Vs Reliance Infrastructure Limited & Ors.

Punj Lloyd Limited Vs Anu Kukreja & Ors.

Manoj Kumar Vs Vijay Kumar Singh - Vice Chairman DDA

Naresh Vs Gyanesh Bharti, Commissioner, MCD & Ors.

Ram Chander Vs S.K.Muan Guite and Anr.