A single judge court disposed of a contempt petition after noting that outstanding dues, including a small water bill amount, would be paid by the respondent through counsel communication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
MADHU KHOSLA AND ANR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nishant Datta, Adv.
versus
SUNIL SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Mahajan Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
ANISH DAYAL, J
MAY 8, 2025/N/ bp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:22:27
Madhu Khosla and Anr.
Sunil Sharma
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
