Petitioner sought withdrawal of a contempt petition. Counsel for the petitioner appeared and prayed for withdrawal; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and directed that the order be uploaded on the court website. No substantive adjudication occurred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
RICHA MADAAN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate.
versus
DEEPANSHU MADAAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Jain, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 21.04.2025
ANISH DAYAL, J
APRIL 21, 2025/RK/na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2025 at 10:57:12
RICHA MADAAN
DEEPANSHU MADAAN
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
