Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior writ judgment. Counsel for the petitioner stated that directions had been complied with and sought leave to withdraw; leave granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
DR. RITU CHOWDHARY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Ms. Ashna Khan, Ms. G. Iqbal, Advs.
versus
PROF. MAMTA SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Priya Shukla, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advs. for R-2 and 6.
Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC, Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Anamika Thakur, Advs for Aditi Mahavidhyalaya.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
“It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to initiate contempt of court proceedings against the respondents/contemnors for deliberate and intentional disobedience of Judgment dated 05.11.2024 of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P.(C) 5708 of 2023 entitled Dr. Ritu Chowdhary vs Prof. Mamta Sharma, Principal & Ors and after giving opportunity of being heard to the respondents/contemnors, they may be punished in accordance with law.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/08/2025 at 11:45:41
AMIT SHARMA, J
AUGUST 21, 2025/ kr/yg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/08/2025 at 11:45:41
2 provisions across 2 enactments
DR. RITU CHOWDHARY
PROF. MAMTA SHARMA
Aditi Mahavidhyalaya
AMIT SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
