Disposed¶18

Jung Bahadur Singh v. Ashok Kumar Verma and Anr.

Contempt – CONT.CAS(C) 210/2025

Delhi HC11 Feb 2025CONT.CAS(C)/210/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court contempt order, CONT.CAS(C) 210/2025, Jung Bahadur Singh v. Ashok Kumar Verma and Anr., Justice Manoj Jain, 11.02.2025 — contempt petition disposed of as not pressed; alleged wilful disobedience of Division Bench order dated 19.09.2024 in W.P.(C) 11451/2016 concerning upgradation of pay scale and payment of arrears; respondents sought four weeks to comply; liberty granted to revive contempt petition by appropriate application.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition by moving an appropriate application if the respondents fail to comply within four weeks. ¶18

Jung Bahadur Singh Vs Ashok Kumar Verma and Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~81

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 210/2025 JUNG BAHADUR SINGH

¶4

.....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus

¶6

ASHOK KUMAR VERMA AND ANR

¶7

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Harshita Chaturvedi, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶9

O R D E R % 11.02.2025

¶10

Petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceeding for wilful disobedience of the order dated 19.09.2024 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 11451/2016 whereby the respondents were directed to suitably upgrade the pay scale of the petitioners within a period of three months and the arrears were to be paid within further three months.

¶11

Ms. Lamba, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that despite the above said specific directions, nothing has been done so far by the respondents.

¶12

Learned counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice and submits that she has received a communication through e-mail from the respondents and they seek four weeks’ time to comply with the order in question.

¶13

CONT.CAS(C) 210/2025 1

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:41:49

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that she would share the e-mail with the learned counsel for the petitioner during course of the day.

¶16

In view of the above said specific statement given by the learned counsel for the respondents, Ms. Lamba, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the moment, does not press the present contempt petition.

¶17

She, however, submits that, in case, nothing is done within a period of four weeks, she may be granted permission to revive the present contempt petition by moving appropriate application.

¶18

The present contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.

¶19

Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶20

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 11, 2025/ss

¶22

CONT.CAS(C) 210/2025 2

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:41:49

Jung Bahadur Singh v. Ashok Kumar Verma and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jung Bahadur Singh v. Ashok Kumar Verma and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niteen Yeola Vs Vartika Kartiyar

Ram Niwas Tyagi Vs Shri Dharmendra , Chief Secretary and Ors.

Mohd Aftab Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Hony. Subedar Major Bir Singh Vs Sh. Mekala Chaitanya Prasad & Anr.

Rajiv Sharma Vs the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Preeti Verma Vs Pankaj Verma

Rajender Vs Shri Ashwani Kumar, Commissioner MCD and Ors.

Vikash Nagar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Vijit Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority through Its Vice-Chairman & Ors.

Ram Niwas Tyagi Vs Shri Dharmendra , Chief Secretary and Ors.

Om Parkash Dang (through Power of Attorney Holder) Vs Union of India & Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs Sh Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

Anita Vs Jatinder Kumar

Weaker Section Welfare and Rehabilitation Society Vs Delhi Development Authority