Contempt petition seeking action for alleged disobedience of a 2017 writ order regarding salary. Petitioner's counsel stated the salary had been received and the petition was not pressed; the court disposed of the petition and pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
SHAIKH MUJIBUR RAHEMAN .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Mr. Prakhar Gupta and Mr. Lalgolen Kipgen, Advocates.
versus
DR. NAJMA AKHTAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjeet Kumar and Mr. Mehvish Khan and Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
“a) Initiate contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnors/respondents for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order dated 22.08.2017 passed in W.P. (C) No. 6987/2017.
b) Award costs of the proceedings to the Petitioner for repeatedly flouting orders passed by this Hon'ble Court; and c) Pass any other or further order/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 13:04:06
AMIT SHARMA, J
OCTOBER 10, 2025/bsr/sg
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 13:04:06
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaikh Mujibur Raheman
Dr. Najma Akhtar
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
