Disposed¶19

Rameshwar Tiwari v. Mr Giridhar Aramane and Ors.

Delhi HC8 Apr 2025CONT.CAS(C)/1358/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; CONT.CAS(C) 1358/2024; Rameshwar Tiwari; Mr Giridhar Aramane; Union of India; contempt petition; non-compliance of order; enforcement of W.P.(C) 7188/2024; Union of India & Ors. v. Rameshwar Tiwari; order dated 20.05.2024; pension arrears payable w.e.f. January 2021; regular monthly pension; stay of operation of impugned order; compliance by respondents; petition disposed; Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar; 08.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Since the respondents complied with the Order dated 20.05.2024 during the pendency of the contempt petition, the Court deemed it improper to proceed further with the petition. ¶18

Rameshwar Tiwari Vs Mr Giridhar Aramane and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~92

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

+ CONT.CAS(C) 1358/2024 RAMESHWAR TIWARI

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Mr.Puneet Taneja, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manmohan Singh Narula, Mr.Amit Yadav & Mr.Anil Kumar, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

MR GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND ORS.

¶7

.....Respondents Through: Mr.Vikrant N Goyal, Adv. for UOI with Mr.Nitin & Ms.Divya Rana, Advs.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 08.04.2025

¶11

This petition has been filed complaining of non-compliance of the Order dated 20.05.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7188/2024, titled Union of India & Ors. v. Rameshwar Tiwari , whereby it was directed as under:

¶12

“ 6 . Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, we are of the view that the matter needs to be considered at some length. However, taking into account the respondent's advanced age as also the fact that the petitioners have approached this Court after more than one and a half years of the passing of the impugned order, even though we are inclined to examine the issue raised by the petitioner, we are of the view that operation of the impugned order should be stayed only to the extent that it directs all arrears of pension to be payable to the respondent.

¶13

7. We, accordingly, direct that subject to the

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:24:02

¶16

petitioner paying arrears of pension w.e.f., January 2021 and, henceforth, continuing to pay him regular monthly pension, the operation of the remaining portion of the impugned order will remain stayed till the next date.”

¶17

We are informed that during the pendency of the present petition, the respondents have now complied with the said order.

¶18

In view of the above, we do not deem it proper to proceed further with this petition.

¶19

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

¶21

RENU BHATNAGAR, J

¶22

APRIL 8, 2025 /rv/VS

¶23

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:24:02

Rameshwar Tiwari v. Mr Giridhar Aramane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rameshwar Tiwari v. Mr Giridhar Aramane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nasir Vs Taqi Ali Khan & Ors.

Anshul Arya Vs Rakesh Chhabra

Panchshila Cooperative House Building Society Vs Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

Abul Fazal Vs Sh. Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.

Pragati Path Educational Foundation S Millennium National School Vs Rahul Singh and Ors.

Shri Satvir Gupta Vs Ms Ishlawati

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Ekta Saluja and Anr.

M/S Ircon International Limited Vs Mr. Vivek Kumar Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Raminder Singh Vs Hargun Kaur Sahni

Union of India through Revenue Secretary & Ors. Vs Brijendra Singh Verma

Staff Selection Commission and Ors. Vs Ashif Ali

Dayanand Adarsh Vidyalaya Vs Deepa Chhibber & Ors.

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Kripal Singh

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Hari Lal