Petition under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC sought withdrawal of a contempt petition. Parties agreed to withdraw all pending proceedings before the Tis Hazari Courts and this Court with liberty to approach the court in future. Application allowed; contempt petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SMT. DIVYA RAMACHANDRAN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Zeeshan Diwan, Adv. versus
SH. SAHIL NAYESH DHARIA .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 19.12.2025
CM APPL. 80327/2025 (Withdraw the petition)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 12:00:34
of.
CONT.CAS(C) 1116/2025
AMIT SHARMA, J
DECEMBER 19, 2025/ nk/ns
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 12:00:34
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Divya Ramachandran
Sh. Sahil Nayesh Dharia
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
