Shri Rizwan Ahmed & Anr. v. Shri Subhasish Panda & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellants to withdraw an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, which was found not maintainable, without examining the merits. The time spent is considered for limitation purposes.
What did the court decide?
Permitted withdrawal of the appeal; appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.APP.(C) 9/2025
SHRI RIZWAN AHMED & ANR. .....Appellants
Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Ms.Gauri Vashisht, Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Mr.Ashish Chaudhary & Mr. Shivam Chaudhary, Advs.
versus
SHRI SUBHASISH PANDA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Aditya Verma & Ms. Antara Mishra, Advs. for R-1 to 4. Ms.Shagun Shahi Chugh, SPC with Ms. Kavya Roy Choudhary, Adv. for R-5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 14.10.2025
- Since the present appeal, filed under Sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, is not maintainable, learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.
- In view of above, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Rizwan Ahmed
- respondent
Shri Subhasish Panda
Coram
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court