Appeal withdrawn after the appellant, granted liberty by the Supreme Court to vacate the property by a stipulated date, opted not to press it. The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
RAMA
.....Appellant
Through: Dr Janak Raj Rana, Advocate. versus
GURNAM SINGH & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr Dinesh Garg, Advocate with R1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R
% 08.08.2025
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
AUGUST 08, 2025 M
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2025 at 12:31:15
RAMA
GURNAM SINGH
V. Kameswar Rao
Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
