Allowed

J.K Oil Industries v. Shree Sanwaria Oil Mill

Delhi HC4 Mar 2025C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)/285/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought cancellation/rectification of the registered trademark 'JAMBH' held by respondent. The parties had settled a related suit, under which respondent undertook not to use 'JAMBH' and to withdraw the trademark application. The High Court accordingly cancelled the registration and directed rectification.

What did the court decide?

Trademark 'JAMBH' (No. 3453490, Class 31) cancelled; Registrar of Trademarks directed to rectify the Register and issue notification.

J.K Oil Industries Vs Shree Sanwaria Oil Mill — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 285/2022

¶4

J.K OIL INDUSTRIES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate (M:9990389539)

¶5

versus

¶6

SHREE SANWARIA OIL MILL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Kr. Mahapatra, CGSC with Mr. Tribhuvan, Mr. Ishwar Malhotra, Advocates for R-2 (M:9811472444)

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶9

O R D E R % 04.03.2025

¶10

The present petition has been filed seeking cancellation/rectification of the trademarks ‘JAMBH’ registered under no. 3453490 in Class 31 in the name of respondent no. 1.

¶11

It is the case of the petitioner that the mark ‘JAMBH’ of the respondent no. 1, is identical/deceptively similar to the prior mark of the petitioner, i.e., ‘JUMBO’.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a copy of an order dated 10^th December, 2024, in CS(COMM) 432/2019, passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, Patiala House Court, arising out of similar dispute between the parties, i.e., petitioner and respondent no. 1. The order dated 10^th December, 2024, reads as under:

¶13

“Heard. File perused.

¶14

At the outset, Ld. Counsel of plaintiff, on instructions, states at Bar,

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:31:38

¶16

the matter has been settled between the parties by way of out of court settlement and hence, he wishes to withdraw the applications u/s 151 CPC, one dated 10-10-2024 for recalling order dated 27-9-2024 and another dated 18-10-2024 for stay of trial before Ld. Local Commissioner.

¶17

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of applicant/ plaintiff, aforesaid both the applications are hereby dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

At this stage, it is jointly submitted on behalf of both the sides that entire disputes involved in the present matter have been settled between parties, by way of out of Court Settlement, according to which, defendant has agreed, inter alia, not to use the impugned trade marks/ labels “JAMBH” or any other trade mark/ word mark/ label, in any form and manner which is identical and / or confusingly or deceptively similar to plaintiff’s registered trade marks/ labels “JUMBO” for any goods and services thereby infringing plaintiff’s registered trade mark, copy right and passing off their goods and business as that of the goods and business of the plaintiff. It is further submitted on behalf of both the sides that the defendant shall withdraw its TM Application No. 3453490 filed by them before the Trade Mark Registry for the impugned trade mark JAMBH and in view of settlement, the plaintiff shall not claim any damages / costs in any manner whatsoever from the defendant qua the present suit. Therefore, it is jointly prayed that consent decree may be passed, in terms of aforesaid settlement.

¶19

Partners of defendant have also appeared through video conferencing and they have affirmed the aforesaid terms of settlement.

¶20

Accordingly, separate statements of counsels of both the sides are recorded in this regard.

¶21

Both parties shall remain bound by the statements made by their respective counsels on their behalf.

¶22

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of both the sides and in view of settlement/ statements recorded on behalf of both the sides and keeping in view overall facts and circumstances of the case, the suit is decreed in favour of plaintiff and against defendant in terms of statements made on behalf of both the sides/ settlement. The statements made on behalf of both the sides/ settlement shall form part and parcel of this order.

¶23

Decree sheet be drawn up accordingly.

¶24

File be consigned to record room, after due compliance.”

¶25

(Emphasis Supplied)

¶26

¶27

Perusal of the aforesaid order clearly shows that respondent no. 1 has categorically stated that it shall not use the trademark/label ‘JAMBH’ or any other trademark/word mark/label, in any form or manner, which is identical or confusingly or deceptively similar to the petitioner’s registered trademark/label ‘JUMBO’.

¶28

Further, respondent no. 1 has also undertaken to withdraw its trademark application no. 3453490 filed by it before the Trademark Registry.

¶29

The present petition pertains to the same trademark, i.e., ‘JAMBH’ registered vide trademark application no. 3453490, qua which, the respondent has already settled the matter with the petitioner herein.

¶30

Accordingly, considering the aforesaid, the trademark ‘JAMBH’, registered in the name of respondent no. 1, vide trademark application no. 3453490 in Class 31, is hereby cancelled.

¶31

Respondent no. 2, i.e., Registrar of Trademarks, is directed to carry out the requisite rectification in its Trademark Register.

¶32

Further, the requisite notification shall also be issued by the Registrar of Trademark, in this regard.

¶33

The Registry is directed to supply a copy of the present order to the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks of India, on E-mail Id: [email protected], for compliance.

¶34

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

¶35

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶36

MARCH 4, 2025 au

¶37

This is a digitally signed order.

¶38

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:31:38

J.K Oil Industries v. Shree Sanwaria Oil Mill

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.K Oil Industries v. Shree Sanwaria Oil Mill

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Sanjay Arora Vs Jasmer

The Indian Hotels Company Limited Vs Ankit Sethi & Ors.

P.K. Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Krbl Limited

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs Dr Best Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Akg Steel Industries & Anr. Vs Akg Plastics Pvt. Ltd.

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs Ahamad Faraz & Ors.