Allowed

Vrb Consumer Products P. Ltd. v. Capital Foods P. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Dec 2025C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)/242/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court considered a joint application under O. 23 R. 3 read with S. 151 CPC filed by the petitioner and respondent 1 alleging a settlement during pendency. The court decreed the suit and disposed of the applications in accordance with the agreed settlement terms, directing compliance with the undertaking to cease trademark use. The subject matter involved commercial disputes, company

What did the court decide?

The suit was decreed in terms of the Settlement Terms. Parties were directed to comply with the agreed terms. The Suit and Applications were disposed of.

Vrb Consumer Products P. Ltd. Vs Capital Foods P. Ltd… — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 242/2025 & I.A. 24779/2025 VRB CONSUMER PRODUCTS P. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Diksha Tekriwal and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates.

¶4

versus CAPITAL FOODS P. LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Mr. Rohil Bansal, Mr. Dhananjay Khanna and Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advocates for R1. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocates for R2.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

O R D E R

% 04.12.2025

I.A. 30320/2025

This is a joint Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶10

The Parties have submitted that during the pendency of the present Suit, the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 have agreed to amicably resolve and settle the dispute in accordance with the Settlement Terms as under:

¶11

“ a. The Petitioner acknowledges the Respondent No. 1 to be the sole proprietor of the registered and well-known trademark and brand SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY, bearing trademark registration no. 2431851 in class 30 and also of the artworks associated with the unique, peculiar and distinctive packaging of its said SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY branded products which are given below and are also subject matter of the copyright registration no. A-149563/2023 dated 08.12.2023 (hereinafter called the Respondent No. 1’s IP).

¶12

Page 1 of 3

¶13

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 242/2025

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 11:37:36

¶16

; and

¶17

b. That going forward, the Petitioner undertakes to never use the Respondent No. 1’s registered and well-known trademark / brand SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY or any other mark/ brand / packaging that may be deceptively similar to the Respondent No. 1’s IP in any form or manner. However, Petitioner shall be free to use non-contentious and commonly used product descriptors such as ‘Schezwan Dip’, ‘Schezwan Sauce’, ‘Schezwan Paste’, ‘Schezwan Spread’, ‘Schezwan Chunky’ or any other bona fide descriptive variants that are not deceptively similar to the Respondent No. l's trade mark SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY; and

¶18

c. That going forward, the Petitioner undertakes to change the name of the impugned products (mentioned in paragraph 2 hereinabove) to “SPICY SCHEZWAN CHILLI CHUNKEY” as given below, so as to avoid any similarity or confusion with the Respondent No. 1’s IP in any form or manner; and

¶19

d. That the Petitioner states that they have not obtained any registration(s) or applied for registering the artwork associated with the packaging of its impugned products (mentioned in paragraphs 2 hereinabove) and / or the trademark SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY and / or any other trademark(s) which may be deceptively similar to or identical with the Respondent No. 1’s IP before the Indian Trade Marks Office or any other authority; and

¶20

e. That going forward, the Petitioner undertake not to obtain any registration(s) or apply for registering the artwork associated with the packaging of its impugned products (mentioned in paragraphs 2 hereinabove) and / or the trade mark SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY and /

¶21

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 242/2025

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 11:37:36

¶25

or any other trade mark(s) which may be deceptively similar to or identical with the Respondent No. 1’s IP before the Indian Trade Marks Office or any other authority; and

¶26

f. The Petitioner undertakes to remove all references to the Respondent No. l's registered and well-known trademark SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY and the impugned products (mentioned in paragraphs 2 hereinabove) from all online / offline platforms within 7 days of signing the present settlement agreement to the extent such removal lies within the Petitioner's control. In the event any reference or trace remains online, the Respondent No. 1 shall intimate the same to the Petitioner, whereupon the Petitioner shall remove it within seven (7) working days. If any such content is hosted or maintained by third parties over whom the Petitioner has no control, the Petitioner shall inform the Respondent No. 1 accordingly and shall further endeavour to request such third parties to remove the said content; and

¶27

g. The parties agree to get the suit pending before the Ld. Commercial Court at Margao, Goa being Commercial Suit No. 2/2023/1 also decreed in terms of the present settlement agreement; and

¶28

h. The Parties agree that the present petition be disposed off in terms of this settlement agreement. ”

¶29

In view of the above, the Parties have requested that the Suit may be decreed in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Terms.

¶30

Accordingly, the Parties are directed to comply with the Settlement Terms as agreed between them. The Suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Terms agreed between the Parties.

¶31

Let the Decree Sheet be drawn up accordingly.

¶32

The Suit is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The pending Applications also stand disposed of.

¶33

The next date before the Court stands cancelled.

¶34

TEJAS KARIA, J

¶35

DECEMBER 4, 2025/sms

¶36

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 242/2025

¶37

Page 3 of 3

¶38

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 11:37:36

Vrb Consumer Products P. Ltd. v. Capital Foods P. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vrb Consumer Products P. Ltd. v. Capital Foods P. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rashi Santoshi Soni & Anr. Vs Prince Enterprises through Its Proprietor Mr. Niraj Nirottamsingh Chavhan

Yc Electric Vehicle Vs Bhuvneesh Kapoor Proprietor of Two Friends Auto Electric Co.

M/S New Bharat Impex Vs M/S Khushi Ram Bihari Lal

Fair Food Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ms Krbl Limited

Surinder Kumar Sole Proprietor M/S Shubham Enterprises Vs Rahul Khanna

Central Park Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Keystone Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.