Trademark matter transferred from IPAB was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither petitioner nor its counsel appeared since 2015 and notices were returned unserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
M/S PRO SOUND PRODUCTS .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
M/S PROSOUND INC & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Deasha Mehta, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 10.03.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J
MARCH 10, 2025/ at
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:45:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer petition should be dismissed where the petitioner has not appeared or prosecuted the matter since 2015.
M/S Pro Sound Products
M/S Prosound Inc
Anr
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
