adjacent multilevel trees inside respective ARITs; (iii) for constructing and using a Level Strength Analysis Chart (LSAC) for size and measurement considerations to structurally prevent multi-level trees from getting overly large inside respective ARITs; and (iv) for the ‘Periodically progresses entities’ to position onto the next successive higher level of ARIT. It is further argued that when the FER was issued on 22.11.2019, objections included lack of inventive steps under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act and prior arts D1 and D2 were cited, however, subsequently in the hearing notice, prior arts D3 and D4 were cited changing the complete complexion of the objections. Be that as it may, Appellant brought out in its reply dated 17.08.2023 to the hearing notice, after the oral hearing scheduled on 02.08.2023, that D3 document PRMLM does not dissect overly large multilevels tree into relational levels of Age Range Interval Tabulation (ARIT) Structure. This teaching of dissecting is a unique feature of the patent application. D3 rides on commonly well understood knowledge of parent and child relationship multi-level structure needed as platform for demonstrating diverse inventive elements. Graduating entities out of multilevel tree system progressions is a unique inventive element, which is nonobvious to any person skilled in the art including D3 document which only discloses a periodic re-structuring and re-positioning of entities in the multilevel marketing matrix hierarchy and is insufficient for comparison with the present invention, which discloses a unique element of graduating every entity out of the entire multi-level tree system progression and does not disclose any non-obvious knowledge for overcoming obstacles of exponential broadening base physic in multi-level tree system and nor does it disclose any non-obvious knowledge that dissects large quantities of
