Petitioner sought to withdraw an interim arbitration petition, stating pages had been inadvertently omitted from filing. Permission was granted with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition; exemption application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
M/S BEERENGAS (INDIA) PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Amarjeet Kumar, Ms Snigdha Singh, Ms Yashika Chadha, Advs.
versus
JINDAL SAW LIMITED .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
I.A. 6633/2025 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 85/2025
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MARCH 12, 2025 RJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 11:45:40
M/s Beerengas (India) Pvt Ltd
Jindal Saw Limited
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
