Disposed¶19

Hero Motocorp Limited v. Shree Balaji Motors

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 9

Delhi HC3 Apr 2025O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/327/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hero MotoCorp Limited v. Shree Balaji Motors; High Court of Delhi; O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 327/2024; decided 03.04.2025 by Jyoti Singh, J.; Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; interim relief; withdrawal of Respondent's legal notice dated 15.09.2024; arbitral award dated 05.12.2024; Respondent's objections to award unaffected; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of, recording the Respondent's stand that the legal notice dated 15.09.2024 stands withdrawn, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the challenge to the arbitral award dated 05.12.2024. ¶19

Hero Motocorp Limited Vs Shree Balaji Motors — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 327/2024

¶4

HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Mr. Rishu Kant Sharma and Ms. Kashish Mathur, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

SHREE BALAJI MOTORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given). CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 03.04.2025

¶11

This petition is preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) seeking appropriate directions to the Respondent to withdraw the legal notice dated 15.09.2024 with immediate effect.

¶12

On 23.09.2024, when this petition was taken up for admission, Court noted the contentions of the Petitioner in paragraph-3 of the order and restrained the Respondent from taking any action on the basis of the notice dated 15.09.2024 till the next date of hearing. It was also noted in the order that in the arbitral proceedings pertaining to same/similar subject matter had concluded and Arbitral Tribunal had reserved the award. Interim order has continued till date.

¶13

Learned counsels for the parties jointly apprise the Court that during the pendency of this petition, Arbitral Tribunal has passed the award on 05.12.2024 and Respondent has taken recourse to legal remedies to

¶14

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 327/2024 Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 13:58:59

¶16

challenge the same. In light of this development, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the impugned notice be withdrawn and petition be allowed.

¶17

Learned counsel for Respondent does not dispute that arbitral award has been challenged by the Respondent and while the Respondent has no objection to withdrawing the notice dated 15.09.2024, however, this should not impact the rights and contentions of the Respondent raised in the objections filed to the arbitral award.

¶18

Since the subject matter of this petition is also the subject matter of the arbitral award and Respondent seeks to withdraw the impugned notice dated 15.09.2024, no further order is required to be passed in this petition, save and except, noting the stand of the Respondent that the notice stands withdrawn. The withdrawal of this notice will not prejudice the rights and contentions of the parties in the challenge to the arbitral award dated 05.12.2024.

¶19

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶20

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶21

APRIL 3, 2025 S.Sharma /shivam

¶22

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 327/2024 Page 2 of 2

¶23

Hero Motocorp Limited v. Shree Balaji Motors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hero Motocorp Limited v. Shree Balaji Motors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Sukhmani Sanmeet Singh Vs Shri Ravinder Singh Kochar & Ors.

Dilip Buildcon Limited Varaha Infra Limited Jv Vs National Highway Authority of India

Sudesh Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

M/S G D Fixtures and Fittings Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sh. Raj Malhotra

Tamilnadu Telecommunications Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr.

Surya Singh Vs Federation of Associations of Small Industries of India & Ors.