Disposed

M/S Slr Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Gail (India) Ltd.

Delhi HC23 May 2025O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/193/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought interim arbitration relief against a clause in GAIL's termination order permitting recovery of dues from its other contracts. Respondent's counsel stated it did not presently intend such cross-contract recovery; the court bound the respondent to that statement and left all rights open for arbitral determination.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Slr Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Gail (India) Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~70

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 193/2025 &7 I.A. 13119/2025

¶4

M/S SLR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Mohan Sinha, Mr. Prateek Mohan Sinha, Ms. Namita Sinha, Ms. Nandini, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S GAIL (INDIA) LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. N.L.Ganpathi, Ms. Sanjana Jain, Advs.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶8

O R D E R % 23.05.2025

¶9

This is a petition filed under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking quashing part of Para No. 15 of the Termination Order dated 20.03.2025 wherein recoveries are sought to be made against the petitioner from any other contracts between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶10

The respondent on 20.03.2025 terminated the Contract awarded to the petitioner. Para No. 15 of Order dated 20.03.2025 reads as under: “15. This is issued without prejudice to GAIL’s rights under the contract/GAIL policy/ Law of Land including but not limited to recovery on account of Price reduction schedule and other damages amount as stipulated under the contract and/or Law. It is hereby notified that GAIL will get the

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:21:20

¶12

balance works/ quantities executed at the risk and cost of the M/s. SLR Construction Pvt. Ltd. M/s. SLR Construction Pvt. Ltd. is hereby advised to clear the site and all liabilities connected to the site / contract. GAIL reserves its right to recover any amount due or will become due under the instant contract from any source (i.e. instant contract or any other contract) available with GAIL including but not limited to by initiating legal action.”

¶13

Mr. Ganpathi, learned counsel for the respondent appears for the respondent and on instructions, states that for the time being, the respondent does not intend to recover the amount due and payable to it from any other Contract between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶14

However, he states that this will be subject to outcome of the arbitration as and when initiated by the parties as the same is interpretation of the terms of the Contract.

¶15

Taking his statement on record and binding the respondent to the same, the petition is disposed of.

¶16

The rights and contentions of parties are left open to be adjudicated through the arbitral mechanism, as and when initiated.

¶17

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶18

MAY 23, 2025/sp

¶19

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:21:20

M/S Slr Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Gail (India) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Slr Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Gail (India) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Salasar Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Xerica Widening Horizons LLP & Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Agrawal Vs Nikhil Aggarwal & Ors.

M/S Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sk Telecom Sales and Service and Ors.

M/S Wedding Park Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd. Vs Balesh Devi Bhadana & Anr.

Cnh Industrial India Private Limited Vs Tara Automobiles Prop Mr Satish Kumar Pandey & Anr.

M/S Dharamvir and Company Vs Delhi Development Authority