Dismissed¶17

Dlf Limited v. Twenty Five Downtown Realty Limited & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Sept 2025O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/137/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

DLF Limited v Twenty Five Downtown Realty Limited; OMP(I)(Comm) 137/2024; Delhi High Court; Jasmeet Singh J; Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 petition dismissed as withdrawn; settlement via Consent Award dated 11.07.2025 by Sole Arbitrator; withdrawal application IA 19188/2025 renotified 17.10.2025; early hearing application IA 22402/2025 under Section 151 CPC allowed; undertakings discharged; hearing date cancelled.

What did the court decide?

Main petition O.M.P.(I)(COMM.) 137/2024 dismissed as withdrawn following settlement recorded in Consent Award dated 11.07.2025 (petitioner with respondents No. 1, 3 and 8); all undertakings stand discharged; pending hearing date of 17.10.2025 cancelled; interim application I.A. 22402/2025 allowed and disposed of. ¶17

Dlf Limited Vs Twenty Five Downtown Realty Limited & Ors. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~94

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 137/2024 DLF LIMITED

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Mr. Kartik Nayar, Ms. Aakriti Vohra, Ms. Megha Dugar, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

TWENTY FIVE DOWNTOWN REALTY LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Khushbu Chhajjed and Ms. Khushbu Trivedi, Advs. for R1 Mr. Karan Bharihoke, Adv for R2 Mr. Nirav Shah, Adv., Mr. Samir Malik, Adv., Ms. Prachi Garg, Adv., Ms. Mehak Shah, Adv., Mr. Varun Kalra, Adv., Mr. Manav Jain, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. for R3 Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Mr Daksh Arora, Advs. for R 4 Ms. Srishti Khare and Ms. Raashika Kapoor, Advs for R5 Mr. Arpit Dwivedi & Ms. Sakshi Kapoor, Advs for R6 Ms. Udita Singh, Adv for R8

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 10.09.2025

¶8

I.A. 22402/2025

¶9

This is an application filed under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 seeking early hearing of the main petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the matter has been settled.

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2025 at 12:24:04

¶12

It is stated that during the pendency of the matter, the petitioner and respondents No. 1, 3 and 8 settled all their disputes as recorded in the Consent Award dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Sole Arbitrator and accordingly, a withdrawal application bearing I.A. No. 19188/2025 was filed by the petitioner, which was listed on 26.08.2025 before this Court, however, the said matter did not reach due to paucity of time and was renotified for 17.10.2025.

¶13

In view of the same, the petitioner is seeking that the main petition along with the withdrawal application be listed on an early date i.e., prior to 17.10.2025, so as to allow the petitioner to withdraw the main petition.

¶14

For the said reasons, the application is allowed and the main petition is taken up for hearing.

¶15

The present application is disposed of accordingly.

¶16

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 137/2024

¶17

In view of the order above in I.A. 22402/2025, since the matter has been settled the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and all undertakings stand discharged.

¶18

The next date of hearing i.e. 17.10.2025 stands cancelled.

¶19

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶20

SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 / (MS)

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2025 at 12:24:04

Dlf Limited v. Twenty Five Downtown Realty Limited & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dlf Limited v. Twenty Five Downtown Realty Limited & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Johri Vs Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd.

S P Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sunil Mehdiratta

Smt. Chandravati Sharma & Anr. Vs Neelmani Sharma & Anr.

Tata Capital Limited Vs M/S Apollo Sales Corporation & Anr.

Ram Saran Das(Since Deceased) Thr Lrs & Anr. Vs M/S Sri Venkatesh Builders & Ors.

Avadh Rail Infra Ltd. Vs Sh. Kapil Verma