Disposed

Dhanuka Agritech Limited v. Iotechworld Avigation Private Limited and Ors.

Delhi HC13 May 2025O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/103/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 9 petition disposed of with parties' consent: petition to be treated as a Section 17 petition before the arbitral tribunal; respondents undertook not to convene a board meeting for sale of shares for four weeks; interim order continued.

What did the court decide?

Petition treated as Section 17 petition; respondents bound not to convene share-sale board meeting for 4 weeks; interim order dated 27.03.2025 continues.

Dhanuka Agritech Limited Vs Iotechworld Avigation Private Limited… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~63

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 103/2025

¶4

DHANUKA AGRITECH LIMITED

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Sujoy Datta and Mr. NPS Chawla, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

IOTECHWORLD AVIGATION PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS

¶9

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Panday and Mr. Nirmal Mishra Advocates

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 13.05.2025

¶13

Learned counsel for the Petitioner and Respondents state that both the parties have nominated their respective Arbitrators, and that the presiding Arbitrator now has to be appointed by the said nominated Arbitrators for constitution of the arbitral tribunal.

¶14

They jointly state that present Section 9 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [‘Act of 1996’] can be placed before the Arbitral Tribunal as a petition under Section 17 of the Act of 1996 to be heard and disposed of finally by the Arbitral Tribunal. 3. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, it is directed that the present petition will be treated as a petition under Section 17 of the Act of 1996 by the Arbitral Tribunal and the reply filed by the Respondents shall be treated as reply to the said petition.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:22:39

¶16

Learned counsel for the Respondents undertakes, for facilitating the hearing of the petition under Section 17 of the Act of 1996, that the Respondents shall not convene any Board meeting pertaining to the sale of shares of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 for a period of four (4) weeks.

¶17

The statement of Respondents that they will not call for a board meeting pertaining for sale of shares of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 for a period of four (4) weeks is taken on record and they are bound down to the same.

¶18

The interim order dated 27.03.2025 passed in these proceedings shall continue unless modified, varied or vacated by the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶19

The learned nominated Arbitrators are requested by this Court to appoint presiding Arbitrator within one (1) week from today so that the Arbitral Tribunal is constituted and the Section 17 petition is heard expeditiously.

¶20

With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of.

¶21

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶22

MAY 13, 2025/ hp/akp

¶23

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶24

Dhanuka Agritech Limited v. Iotechworld Avigation Private Limited and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanuka Agritech Limited v. Iotechworld Avigation Private Limited and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atul Dua Vs Nkj Biofuel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/S Juniper Green Energy Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Mr. Mohammad Rafiuddin & Ors.

Peptech Biosciences Limited Vs Mankind Agritech Private Limited

M/S Delhi Plastichem Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr Krishan Kumar

Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited Vs Ms. Sukhleen Aneja & Anr.

Shri. Coimbatore S. Vaidyanathan Vs M/S Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.