Disposed¶18

Gae Project Pvt. Ltd. v. Ge T and D India Ltd.

Delhi HC26 Nov 2025O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/100/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sole arbitrator appointment; substitution of earlier arbitrator by consent; R.K. Yadav (Retd. Principal District Judge, Delhi) appointed; arbitration under DIAC aegis, rules and Schedule of Fees; disclosure under Section 12(2) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 within a week of entering on reference; rights and contentions kept open; GAE PROJECT PVT LTD v GE T AND D INDIA LTD; O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 100/2025; Delhi High Court; Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; order dated 26.11.2025; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Substitution of the earlier arbitrator with the consent of the parties and appointment of Mr. R.K. Yadav (Retd. Principal District Judge, Delhi) as Sole Arbitrator, with arbitration under the aegis of DIAC per its rules and fee schedule; all rights and contentions left open for the arbitrator. ¶18

Gae Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ge T and D India Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Appointment (and substitution by consent) of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the inter se disputes between the parties.

¶11

Court's answer

With the consent of the parties, the earlier arbitrator stands substituted.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

Mr. R.K. Yadav (Retd. Principal District Judge, Delhi) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the inter se disputes between the parties.

¶11

Key takeaways

The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and in terms of its rules and regulations.ratio¶12
The Sole Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.ratio¶12
The Sole Arbitrator is requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within a week of entering on reference.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J.), order dated 26.11.2025 in O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 100/2025 and I.A.24726/2025 — GAE PROJECT PVT LTD v. GE T AND D INDIA LTD: With the consent of the parties, the earlier arbitrator stands substituted and Mr. R.K. Yadav (Retd. Principal District Judge, Delhi) is appointed Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the inter se disputes. The arbitration is to take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) in terms of its rules and regulations, with fees as per the DIAC Schedule of Fees. The Sole Arbitrator is requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within a week of entering on reference. All rights and contentions regarding claims/counter-claims are kept open; nothing in the order is an expression of opinion on the merits. Petition disposed of.

¶1

$~O-38

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 100/2025 and I.A.24726/2025

¶4

GAE PROJECT PVT LTD .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Swati Bansal with Mr. K.S. Mahadevan, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GE T AND D INDIA LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sulabh Rewari with Mr. Ritwik Gupta, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R

¶9

% 26.11.2025

¶10

With the consent of the parties, the earlier arbitrator stands substituted.

¶11

Mr. R.K. Yadav (Retd. Principal District Judge, Delhi) (Mobile No.9910384623, e-mail id: [email protected]) is being appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the inter se disputes between the parties.

¶12

The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and in terms of its rules and regulations. The Sole Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

¶13

The Sole Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within a week of entering on reference.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/12/2025 at 12:09:36

¶16

All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the Sole Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.

¶17

Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of opinion of this Court on the merits of the controversy between the parties. Let a copy of the instant order be sent to the Sole Arbitrator through electronic mode as well.

¶18

Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of.

¶19

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶20

NOVEMBER 26, 2025 tr/sph

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/12/2025 at 12:09:36

Gae Project Pvt. Ltd. v. Ge T and D India Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gae Project Pvt. Ltd. v. Ge T and D India Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tata Capital Limited Transferee of Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs Shakti Auto Spares and Ors.

Shawntel Consultancy Services Vs Netsys Network Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi Vs Jyotsna Bedi

Seaway Falcon as Vs Jagson International Limited

Ravi Popli Vs Chakr Innovation Private Limited

Syed Neelam Akhtar Vs Jitender Jain and Anr.