Petitioners sought review of a Delhi High Court judgment dismissing their petition. The court found no error apparent on the face of the record, observing that the review sought another decision on merits, and dismissed the review application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
RUPAN JAIN AND ORS .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 30.05.2025
CM APPL. 35375/2025(exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
REVIEW PET. 339/2025
MANOJ JAIN, J
MAY 30, 2025/ sw/JS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:49:31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the judgment dated 26.05.2025.
Shatrughan Prasad and Ors
Rupan Jain and Ors
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
