This chamber petition sought a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit promptly as it was at the stage of final arguments. The Court observed that no specific direction was needed as the Trial Court had already heard arguments and scheduled the next hearing for finalizing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
SANDEEP PANDEY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ram Kishan, Advocate.
versus
NUEVO POLYMERS PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Chahar and Mr. Naveen Chauhan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 877/2025
1
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 0.05.2025 16:44:09
earlier occasions, there is no real requirement of passing any direction in the matter.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
MAY 9, 2025 st/pb
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 877/2025
2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 0.05.2025 16:44:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court should be directed to dispose of the suit in a time-bound manner.
Sandeep Pandey
Nuevo Polymers Pvt Ltd
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
