Petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of a divorce petition pending before the Family Court, Karkardooma. The Court declined time-bound directions given the trial court's board position and disposed of the petition with fresh directions to expedite and avoid unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79
SUSHIL KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Imran Khan & Mr. Jitto Joseph, Advocates
versus
ANURADHA KASHYAP .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 16.01.2025 CM APPL. 2656/2025 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 81/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:08:08
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
JANUARY 16, 2025 RM
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:08:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue time-bound directions for expeditious disposal of the pending divorce petition before the Family Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Kumar
Anuradha Kashyap
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
