Petitioner sought to withdraw and refile a petition before a competent court in terms of observations in an earlier impugned order. The petition was not pressed and stands disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Angad Mehta with Mr. Arsh, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Grover and Ms. Pratibha Vyas, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 19.03.2025 1. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for petitioner submits that without prejudice to his rights and contentions, he would take requisite steps for the purposes of re-filing the petition before the Court of Competent Jurisdiction in terms of the observations appearing in para 11 of impugned order dated 07.03.2025. He, therefore, does not press the petition, at the moment.
MANOJ JAIN, J
MARCH 19, 2025 /sw/js
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:40:59
C P Rama Rao Sole Proprietor
National Highway Authority of India
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
