Delhi High Court dismissed a civil miscellaneous petition in default and for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on three consecutive hearing dates, including the current date. Pending applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
SMT IMARTI DEVI .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
MR PANNA LAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Yadav, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
%
O R D E R 12.03.2025
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called-
out.
The record shows that no one had appeared for the petitioner on the last 02 dates i.e., 18.03.2024 and 27.09.2024.
In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. The petition is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
MARCH 12, 2025
ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:31:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence on multiple hearing dates?
Smt Imarti Devi
Mr Panna Lal & Ors.
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
