Petition concerning a suit property was withdrawn after counsel for the respondents stated the property had been sold to a third party. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to seek an appropriate legal remedy.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
versus
SONU BAKSHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satyaveer Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MARCH 7, 2025/ sky/f
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:45:33
Shivani Kapoor and Anr
Sonu Bakshi and Anr
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
