Rachna Prothi v. Raghav Goel & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw a petition before the Delhi High Court, stating she no longer wished to pursue it; the court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petitioner sought to withdraw a petition before the Delhi High Court, stating she no longer wished to pursue it; the court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Satyender Chahar, Mr. A.M. Nair & Mr. Nimish, Advs.
RAGHAV GOEL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Ms. Tamanna Agarwal & Mr. Vineet Kumar Mishra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 03.07.2025
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 3, 2025/ck/SS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2025 at 12:01:32
Rachna Prothi
Raghav Goel
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court