Ansal Housing Limited v. Vikas Jain & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an NCDRC order deciding a modification application. The High Court found the order completely unreasoned and silent on the petitioner's arguments, holding that effective hearing requires disclosure of arguments and reasons in the order. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the NCDRC with a four-week deadline.
What did the court decide?
Impugned NCDRC order set aside; NCDRC directed to hear both sides afresh on the modification application and pass a reasoned order within four weeks.