Petitioner challenged a Family Court order and sought interim visitation rights regarding his minor child, contending his Section 26 HMA application was not considered. The High Court permitted withdrawal and granted two days to file a fresh Section 26 application before the Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
ABHISHEK MAHAJAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Harshit Joshi and Mr. Vikrant Kumar, Advocates.
versus
SHILPA MAHAJAN .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 15.10.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/10/2025 at 11:52:22
residing within the same vicinity and though the petition was filed on 15.09.2025 before the learned family Court and was listed for the first time on 10.10.2025, and subsequent to issuance of notice the matter was listed on 13.01.2026.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
OCTOBER 15, 2025/NA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/10/2025 at 11:52:22
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court failed to consider the petitioner's Section 26 HMA application for interim visitation rights.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. K. S. Sumi Mol v. Sh. Suresh Kumar E. K.Relied on¶3
[2023:DHC:5963-DB]
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhishek Mahajan
Shilpa Mahajan
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
