Petitioner sought directions to the trial court for expeditious disposal of a 2018 tenancy suit. Finding no special reason to prioritise the hearing, counsel sought withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~85
ANIL VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Srishti Garg, Advocate
versus
ANIL SUNEJA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 15.10.2025
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
OCTOBER 15, 2025 ‘ rs’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:07:28
Anil Verma
Anil Suneja & Ors.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
